2/2/2024 0 Comments Readability vs instapaperIt'd be up to you from there to safely munge the CoreData object hierarchy in a way resembling the official clients, but at least you'd be able to linearize those updates against iCloud messages. Probably the simplest way to do this is to write your own Ubiquity+CoreData client libraries and present yourself as another device that wants to sync against the iCloud account. That's what I really want: the ability to sync Chrome with iCloud even if I currently have no active iCloud-attached devices. Now, the real challenge would be doing this syncing as part of some "syncing service" running on a cloud VM somewhere, that doesn't actually want to run thousands of headless copies of Safari. Like Pocket and Instapaper, it can save articles for later, but in addition it has a Read Now feature in the extension. (And if you can't manage to make it do so, you can write a Safari plug-in presenting a locally-bound HTTP API that the Chrome extension can talk to.) Readability is the read-later service underdog. OSA is no COM, but it works just fine for this sort of thing. If you want to manipulate Safari's container, you can prod Safari itself into doing so. Still, even with the way iCloud works, you don't need to directly prod the data. CalDAV calendar URLs from Calendars.app for iCloud calendars, and these CalDAV resources are writable if you want them to be. Safari bookmark sync, Notes and Reminders, Calendars, etc.) just stayed WebDAV-based with their CoreData databases being purely local+ephemeral, rather than migrating over into using full-on Ubiquity-synced CoreData stores. Readability is free.Ah, this is what had me confused: I was assuming that the parts of "iCloud" that preceded the creation of the Ubiquity sync protocol (e.g. Now, if only they add support for PDF and ebook/epub formats I would live in Readability. So, for me, Readability has won out as my favorite “read later” app. The interface on iPhone and iPad are so lovely that I wish Readability would redesign all the ebook apps because the typography and color options for reading in bright light, at night or somewhere in the middle are just fabulous. The web interface is clean with beautiful typography but it was the mobile apps with typography from Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Pocket is free.Īnd then I finally started digging into Readability and I fell in love with it. I thought this was going to be my favorite and I have been using it for several weeks for reminders for the Link Love weekly posts. Pocket is a much more graphic interface, more colorful and pretty easy to read. Pocket is a great option if your “read later” needs lean towards visuals because the interface features a photo from the page if one is available. The web account is free but apps for your mobile device are paid apps. If you want a simple reader and the option that will most likely to link to all your favorite sites, stick with Instapaper. Instapaper is the original option and has lots of connections with tons of social networking apps and lots of other places but it is bland as the web interface looks. So, do you want my opinion about the options? Okay, that wasn’t too helpful unless you are using a Blackberry, own a Nook or you absolutely love having a web extension. Its gotten so complicated, I’m going to have to make a spreadsheet….įirefox, Chrome, Safari and Opera plug-in, bookmarklet After a post several weeks ago asking all you fine readers about the best options for reading news and saving articles, I narrowed down the list for the “read later” options to three of the most popular options:Įach offers bookmarklets or plug-ins for popular browsers, each offers apps for iPhone, iPad and Android, and all ofthem will integrate with a number of popular apps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |